Do We Have A Double Sun?
by Henry Rasmusen
We definitely DO have TWO SUNS, according to M. F. Malin, of Salt
Lake City, who has spent much of his spare time for over forty years
in pursuit of such a theory.
The possibility of the existence of a double sun in our solar system
began for Malin in 1917, when he overhead a conversation between two
men, evidently scientists, on a train in New Jersey.
The subject of their conversation was the failure of the law of
gravitation with respect to the relations of Earth and Sun - their
conclusion being that the basis of velocities of bodies in space
must be otherwise than that laid down in Newton's PRINCIPIA. Malin
was studying sculpture at the time, at the National Academy of
Design in New York.
This failure of the gravitational law was shocking to him, for even
he knew that Newton's mathematical demonstrations in this connection
had formed the groundwork of the whole of modern mechanics,
engineering and physics.
How could the law have failed, when the results of this work were
already interwoven throughout the whole structure of science in all
its branches? The modern researches of Einstein and others were
always said to have enhanced the value of the PRINCIPIA.
The matter attracted the young sculptor so greatly that from that
time he began to divide his attention about equally between
sculpture and astrophysical study, often working far into the night
in efforts to improve his meager knowledge of mathematics, and
spending his available time poring over astronomical and
astrophysical works in the libraries.
Quite early in these studies, he found that although Newton had
proven his law very successfully in connection with the Earth-Moon
system, he had been forced to abandon his efforts to apply it to the
relations of Earth and Sun because the sun's distance and dimensions
were not known with any degree of accuracy in his time.
A couple of centuries later (after 1894), when the sun's distance
and size had been agreed upon and established internationally, the
apparent discrepancies in the gravitational relations of Earth and
Sun had become painfully evident.
Usuing the sun as a CENTER OF ATTRACTION, with the Earth-Moon system
as a unit of measurement, the proper elements of the earth's orbit
were readily calculable - but everywhere seemed to be awry.
The earth's distance, period and velocity were hopelessly at
variance with each other according to the gravitation law, but the
distance and period had been established by observation and could
not be adjusted. Also, the sun's size in connection with these
elements presented an awkward problem.
After many a headache over the situation, the calculators of the day
had given up, and had conceded that the basis of velocities in
Nature must be other than in Newton's work and had offered the poor
parody of gravitational relations on the part of Sun and Earth which
is current in the astronomy books of today.
This was even more intriguing than ever, because it was perfectly
clear that this basis of velocities - that is, the amount of
material in the body divided by the square of the distance of the
attracted particle - literally IS THE LAW OF GRAVITATION, and that
upon this point the Newtonian law as a whole must stand or fall.
Here was something which could not be thrust aside by denials or
contradictions; it was something no mathematician could deny. What
could be wrong? And why had the failure seemed to apply ONLY to the
relations of Earth and Sun?
Malin made some simple calculations which showed that
THE SUN HAS LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE VOLUME OF MATERIAL
REQUISITE TO ITS EXISTENCE AS THE CENTRAL ATTRACTION OF
THE PLANETARY SYSTEM,
even if its average density were the same as that of the earth.
And if its density were only about one-fourth as great as that of
the Earth - as the astronomer USUALLY RECKONS - the discrepancy
would be all the more hopeless.
How could a discordancy of such proportions ever have been glossed
over for the public in the astronomy books? People in general, even
among the scientists, seemed entirely unaware that the sun-centered
theory and the law of gravitation WERE IRRECONCILABLE.
No doubt some of the mathematicians knew but could not face the
issue, not knowing anything that could be done about it. And WHERE
WAS THE REMAINDER OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM?
There seemed to be only one possible place in the system. For a
body larger than the sun in volume, or the equivalent with unequal
a position PERPETUALLY IN ALIGNMENT BEHIND THE SUN
AS SEEN FROM THE EARTH,
incredible as this might seem at first glance.
And if there were a relationship between mass and brightness among
stars, perhaps THE GREATER STAR WOULD BE BRIGHTER AND HOTTER THAN
THE SUN, and there should be some physical signs of its presence.
If such a body existed, the planetary system would revolve around a
center of gravity SITUATED BETWEEN THE TWO, SOME DISTANCE BEYOND THE
It was not very difficult to calculate the proper radius of Earth's
orbit by Newton's methods, and this turned out to be 101,300,000
miles - placing the possible center of gravity of the system about
4,800,000 miles BEYOND THE SUN.
Later, Malin wrote an imaginative account of the physical
appearances which might be expected if there were a brighter and
hotter star operating at comparatively close range BEHIND THE SUN,
and made drawings to illustrate the writing.
Of course, he already supposed that the solar corona and the
zodiacal lights were involved. He went deeper into the findings of
observation in the reality and compared the real phenomena with his
drawings, searching the periodicals and books for new observations,
new findings, new information.
As the years passed, it became more and more clear that the
imaginative phenomena were all present in the planetary system but
formed a bewildering chain of scientific mysteries on the strictly
sun-centered plan of Copernicus.
The scientific situation could all be summed up in the words of the
eminent astronomer Simon Newcomb,
"The amazing fact that observation has opened up mainly
mysteries in the sun; that as a result the world is
farther than ever from a satisfactory solution to solar
Malin had grown up in the Mormon faith, in fact had spent two years
as a missionary in New Zealand before he was twenty. Something
which might have helped him substantiate the double sun theory in
his own mind is to be found in one of the basic books of Mormon -
THE PEARL OF GREAT PRICE.
The book is mainly a compilation of material which the Mormon
founder-prophet, Joseph Smith had translated into English from a
scroll of Egyptian papyrus brought to him by a stranger in the
Among other things in the translation was a group of heiroglyphics,
showing humans, birds and symbological figures. One of these
symbols Smith interpreted as being "a planet called Kolob, which is
directly BEHIND THE SUN."
Whether or not this had any influence on Malin's thinking, it is an
In 1931 a booklet, SOLAR ARRANGEMENT, was distributed to the worlds
major observatories. It contained drawings which portrayed the
Zodiacal body with its light and heat AS A SEPARATE ENTITY BEHIND
THE SUN from the earth, with all the sun's major "mysteries" DRAWN
IN AS NORMAL PHENOMENA.
Up to that time, Dr. Fath's spectrum of the zodiacal light had been
accepted as a matter of course - indicating that the light consisted
MERELY OF REFLECTED SUNLIGHT.
The light had long been so much a mystery that very little had ever
been written about it in the astronomy books. Within a year,
several new spectra appeared from various scientific sources, all of
them showing the zodiacal light TO HAVE AN EMISSION SPECTRUM OF ITS
OWN, APART FROM THOSE OF THE SUN, the corona and the aurora.
(Vangard note...a critical point in this paper, the fact that
there were DIFFERENT EMISSION SPECTRA from readings taken from
the rim and those taken from the interior surface of the disk)
Malin's drawings and text represented the solar corona as being
intensely hot in the space AROUND THE EDGE OF THE SUN'S VISIBLE DISK
- being the gaseous product of TERRIFIC RADIATION poured out upon
the sun's body at comparatively close range FROM A PLACE BEHIND IT.
In the years that have followed, the sun, with a measured facial
temperature of about 6,000 degrees Centigrade, has been found to be
SITTING IN THE MIDST OF ATOMIC CORONAL TEMPERATURES OF A MILLION
DEGREES AND MORE..
Incidentally, this leaves the scientists to suppose that they are
looking through a million degrees of termperature IN FRONT OF THE
SUN when measuring 6,000 degrees Centigrade ON THE SOLAR SURFACE, if
they adhere to the SUN-CENTERED IDEA.
It may be added, that in their researches of today the physicists
USUALLY DISTINGUISH between the zodiacal light area of the SOLAR
CORONA (light and radiation radiating from the circumference of the
disk) and the SOLAR AREA (across the diameter of the disk). Why
would they have to distinguish between the two readings if it is A
Some college professors have found the yearly period on the part of
the binary to be impossible, but this is because they have started
out by ASSUMING THE SUN TO BE SELF-SUFFICIENT with every other body
As matters stand, the astronomers and physicists have only to
acknowledge that the conditions on and in front of the visible solar
disk ARE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from those found in the violent upheaval
and gaseous turmoil AROUND ITS "EDGES," and then THE REST WILL
FOLLOW as a matter of course, and soon the strictly sun-centered
theory will be as obsolete as the epicycles of the earth-centered
Then our solar system will be acknowledged to have a double sun,
WHICH IS THE RULE, NOT THE EXCEPTION in the Universe.
Another incredible chunk of information....There are some
bizarre things going on with the Sun and the properties of
light in space. John Keely says that the Sun and stars are
invisible when viewed from space. Light only manifests when in
the presence of a gas which serves as a percussive medium for
the Aether to allow the generation of light through
interference; thereby slowing the Aether to lower frequencies.
Rudolph Steiner also says that the Sun and stars are invisible
from space. Tom Brown (of Borderland Sciences in California)
says he talked on the phone to one astronaut who said they
could not take pictures of the Sun or stars UNLESS the camera
was inside the ship (where there is air). On hearing this, Tom
called NASA and asked the Public Information Officer if the Sun
could be seen from space. The PIO said of course.
At that point Tom explained about the story he was working on
and that he had talked to an astronaut who confirmed the
premise of no visible light from space. The PIO got very upset
on the phone and said that information was not supposed to be
given to the public.
We here at Vangard Sciences work from the premise that Aether
is the PRIME CONTINUUM or the fundamentally highest possible
frequency of this universe. In its division, it produces
magnetism, electricity, light, heat, sound, vibration and mass.
What if the 2nd sun was a doorway to a dimension of energy
which breaks through to sustain this section of space?
The channel Hilarion (Maurice Cooke) from Canada offers some
interesting thoughts on protons, electrons and the 4th
dimension which seem to back up such a contention. He says
Protons are escape points from the 4th dimension to the 3rd
(where we are). We perceive these points as energy of a higher
potential than the normal background level. The rotation is
also specific for this polarity.
Once this potential exhausts itself, the rotation reverses from
that of a proton at which point we perceive it as an electron.
Electrons group to develop sufficient energy to create an escape
point from the 3rd to the 4th dimension through which to replay
the never-ending cycle.
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346